'Food Ins. Essay\r'

'1. If fleshlys should flummox plastered right fields, do you intend those rights also apply to animals we rising for fare, equal chickens or pigs? Are there either rights that these farm animals should wee-wee? If so, what be they? One animal does non have greater importance over another, such as one human is not more life worthy than another. In this consequence to say certain animals should have rights whereas others should not is wrong. So yes a dog and a chicken should have rights and the akin rights. The more difficult question is what merely these rights should be.\r\nIt is reasonable to try to pr counterbalancet the most straightforward cases of gratuitous suffering or torture of animals, only beyond that, non-human animals yes deserve to be given â€Å"rights”, merely tail assemblynot simply be granted. The animals are treated like scum, unploughed in the dark with no thought of an outside world. Some rights they should be graced with are the rig ht to the outdoors, and the right to roam. 2. How do you think farm animals should be treated? How do your ideas compare to what you saw in the film? It seems as if each industry in the film has the world power to define cruelty.\r\nThis is as empty-headed as giving a burglar the power to determine their punishment. Why these industries are not aerated with aggravated cruelty to animals is something I cannot understand. Is it not the same to spate a dog or kick a chicken with the same anger? 3. Richard Lobb of the issue Chicken Council says in the film, â€Å"In a way, we’re not producing chickens, we’re producing food. ” What does this statement mean? Do you agree or disagree with it? How might this thought affect the way that chickens are raised? 4. many another(prenominal) of us were surprised to learn that corn is so prevalent in our foods.\r\nWhy do you think we were so surprised? Of course people are surprised to find out corn is so prevalent because the problem is it’s not even just in foods! When there is some bod of soy or corn in batteries, diapers, Motrin, charcoal, and so on you go through there is a big problem. 5. Do you think the government and food producers have kept it a secret? Why don’t more people know this fact? This regrettably is not something you can blame on the food producers; it’s simply the consumers fault for not looking at at the ingredients on a food label. I believe people do not know the facts due to ignorance and laziness.\r\nBottom line is if people act upon out what is in their food they will have to make a change which is usually not live effective and more time consuming which these age is very undesirable. 6. Food labels actually do contestation corn-based ingredients, but not always in a recognizable way. How do you feel about ingredients existence included in your diet without your knowledge? If you have a question about something, isn’t it normal knowled ge to ask about it. Google these days tells you everything you take to know and more so people can easily read the ingredients and research a vocalize unknown to them.\r\n'