Keep Blaming Canada Essay -- Music Downloads Technology Essays

Keep Blaming CanadaIn 1999, Shawn Fanning and his little program called Napster created sooner a stir in society. Napsters softwargon allows medication listeners to open pieces of their in-person hard drives to everyone using Napster, sharing whatever MP3 songs they have already downloaded or stored. At any time, thousands of people are online, sharing hundreds of thousands of songs, many of which are technically illegal to download without the permission of the copy cover holders. 1 This led to a lawsuit filed by the Recording Industry Association of America, with the rock conference Metallica as its frontman. In this case, several issues were brought up, one of which was the right of the creator of the music to control what happens with their intellectual property. In the United States, it was found illegal, in the human body of procure laws, for people to download the musicians music without permission. However, this unless gave full rights of intellectual property to the creator. But this was only the ruling in the United States. Other countries have different versions of copyright Laws with different interpretations. Copyright in CanadaIn Canada, the Canadian copyright law is governed by the Copyright Act, which protects original literary, artistic, musical and dramatic works. One very significant right granted to the owner of Canadian copyright in a work, is the goop right to reproduce the work, in any material form they choose. For example, the owner of copyright in a book has the right to stop others from do copies of the book, whether the write is by way of a commercial printer, a xerox machine, or by way of a computer image/ text edition scanner. Copyright in a work may be delegate or licensed to others. All assignments and licenses of copyright must be in writing to be valid. The mere transfer of physical possession of a work does not thereby include an assignment of copyright in the work. 2 These seem similar to the Copyright laws found in the United States. It provides similar protection to literary work, artistic, music and so on. But as the multiplication change, so too will the way the laws work.Changes to the ActOn establish 19, 1998, Part VIII of the Copyright Act dealing with private copying was brought up for a major change. Before that, copying any just recording for almost any purpose infringed copyright, although, in prac... ...http//www.cb-cda.gc.ca/news/c19992000fs-e.html.3 Borland, John. P2P downloading is legal, says Canada. 15 December 2003. Silicon.com. 9 February 2004. .4 OReilly, Tim. Piracy is Prograssive Taxation, and Other Thoughts on the exploitation of Online Distribution. 12 December 2002. OpenP2P.com. 9 February 2004. .5 Reid, Shaheem and Walker, Curtis. 50 Cent Says Hes Capitalizing On Arrest, Doesnt assessment Being Bootlegged. 16 January 2003. VH1.com. 10 February 2004. .6 King, Howard. Why Metallica Sued Napster. 1 May 2001. Findlaw.com 10 February 2004. .7 Kearns, Dave. Intellectual property Napster and ethics, 9 April 2001. Network World. 10 February 2004. .8 Barlow, John Perry. display 1994. The Economy of Ideas. Wired. Issue 2.03. 10 February 2004 .