Research English Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Research English - Essay ExampleAccording to Horvat et al (2003 p319) ... amicable variety involves the grouping of people in society on the basis of the collective features of individuals... This implies that social potpourri involves the grouping of individuals in society based on common social features. Based on these characteristics, social scientists and other interest groups in the society underside identify similar characteristics and make generalizations which can jockstrap in the improvement of lives in the society. There atomic number 18 many possible ways of classifying people in the society. Historically, the most popular basis for the potpourri of people in the American society has been race (Thompson & Hickey, 2005). In other words, people were grouped into various categories based on their skin color and race-related features like nervus facialis features, hair types amongst others. For generations, this remained convenient because the skin/racial features offer ed the most conspicuous method of identifying individuals uniquely. However, in the 21st Century, the sorting of people into groups based on their racial features has been found to be unconstitutional, unfair, illegal and unacceptable. Due to this development, people are classified into groups in ways that are legally acceptable. This enables interest groups to study and get a beloved understanding of general trends in the American society and provide better ways of improving the livelihoods of individuals finished collective methods. There are numerous ways that individuals are classified in America. The different methods of classification of social groups is based on a number of criterion. Schooler & Schoenbach (1994) identify that the most popular basis for the classification of individuals into groups in America are jobs, income, education, wealth and social intercommunicates. People can be classified on the basis of the rank they occupy in the workplace. This is based on th e logic that individuals with the same rank pay certain unique behaviors, trends, habits, attitudes to job security and preferences. Thus operatives in businesses in America and management can be grouped in separate categories since their behavior and tastes are likely to be fashioned along similar lines since they are affected by the same circumstances most of the time. People can to a fault be categorized on the basis of the train of income they make. This is because income is likely to affect the spending habits and preferences of individuals and the collective video can give room for some generalizations. For instance people earning just large to pay for grassroots necessities are likely to behave in a way that is different from people who earn enough to cover their basic needs, security needs and to a fault get some excess to save and invest. In practical terms, whilst the first group will focus on survival matters, the second group readiness be considering better ways of spending their money and more fruitful investment activities that will call for them more returns. This shows that there is a clear distinction between the two groups. The educational and wealth level of each group of people also determines their social classification. This is because education often affects the mental scope of individuals and also affects the earning power of individuals. Thus people can be grouped on the bases of their education and wealth. Also, the social network a person belongs to is important